Another Christmas at Trendles…

…where is the time going?  Our teams have now almost finished identifying the pottery and animal bone from the excavations and for the first few months of next year we will be busy preparing for our exhibition to be held at Abingdon Museum in the Spring.

But for now it’s time to relax into the Christmas period and we were very pleased to welcome William Wintle to the lovely old boardroom at Manor Farm where we held our Christmas party. Before we all tucked in to the Christmas goodies and Simon’s special Roman mulled wine (for the non-drivers!) William spoke to us about the research he has undertaken over several years in the fields surrounding our Roman temple and amphitheatre on Trendles Field.

Through his geophysics he showed us barrow cemeteries, field systems and settlements dating from the Bronze Age through to the Roman period.  These sites have disappeared above ground and many of William’s findings came as a surprise, even to those of our volunteers who live in the surrounding villages.  With so much archaeology in the area William didn’t have time to talk about the Roman villas, but he has promised to come back again next year to tell us more.

Interesting talk, good food and great company – it was a lovely way to end the year.

The Human Bone Blog

Each season of excavation on Trendles Field brought its own surprises.  Not least were the discoveries of a small group of human burials in the bank of the semi-amphitheatre (more to come on this soon) and, a few seasons later, a rare Iron Age burial ground.

Thanks to all the hard work of our volunteers we now have time to do some additional smaller projects, such as looking in more detail at the Roman coin collection. On Thursday we also began the task of examining the people from the Iron Age burial ground.  This will involve a detailed look at each skeleton, taking a large number of measurements to work out the height and age of the person at their time of death and to look for signs of any injury they might have suffered.  Occasionally illness can also cause changes in the bones or teeth, creating a permanent record of the condition. Most of the Iron Age burials are of young people and for now we have roughly estimated that they were in the region of 12-16 years old when they died. Because of their age we don’t think it will be possible from visual analysis alone to tell whether they were male or female as the bones will not have changed sufficiently to differentiate between the sexes.

As we examine the skeletons we will keep a record of some of our findings in a blog under Trendles Topics – so check the link for any news!

Priscilla, Pheasants and Publication

Regular training sessions for both staff and volunteers are an important part of the Trendles Project and on the 11th March we were pleased to invite our animal bone specialist Priscilla Lange back to talk to us about how she prepares animal bone reports for publication. The bones we are analysing at the moment are from the Roman period, with the majority from animals that have been domesticated for food, sheep being particularly popular, but also cattle and pig. Occasional finds of deer bones show that hunting occurred on a very small scale and we can also see that horse, dog and possibly cat were present around the site during that period. We have been intrigued to find what we think are pheasant bones amongst the bones recovered from Trench 18, the area of shops and food stalls directly outside the temple. Priscilla confirmed that the Romans were responsible for introducing pheasants into Britain and they are usually associated with high status sites, which of course Trendles is.

Priscilla will look in detail at the bones we are identifying from the Roman and Iron Age periods, calculating the minimum number of individuals for each species across each trench to see if diet changed over time and, where possible, the age at death. If lots of very young animals are in the assemblage then dairying might have been important, if the animals were killed just as they reached their prime then they were probably being raised for meat, and the cuts of meat the bones represent will tell us something about the prosperity of the site. It might also be possible to determine what activities were taking place. Amongst the bones we are finding bone tools, fragments of bone pins and off-cuts from bone-working and perhaps we will be able to determine the location of small workshops.   We still have a long way to go, but already the bones, along with all the other finds from Marcham, are beginning to show how the story of life and lifestyle in Iron Age and Roman Marcham might unfold.

Roman coins – Friends, Romans, Countrymen, lend me your Hawthorns…..

HawthornRoman coins and hawthorns, what on earth is the connection? Well, last autumn Guy Bud, a second year Oxford Ancient and Modern History undergraduate, started looking at our large assemblage of Roman coins from the site. Guy is an enthusiastic numismatist and was interested in looking at the range and nature of our assemblage. In the course of his analysis he discovered our coins came from a wide range of mints all over the Roman Empire, as far away as Constantinople. He also pointed out that the date range spans almost the whole of the occupation of Roman Britain, from the 1st c. A.D. to the very late issues of the early 5th century – though the bulk of our coins are undoubtedly 3rd and 4th c. Our coin assemblage numbers over 2,500 coins and this is largely because it is temple site where coins featured as a major type of votive offering. Guy has also pointed out that some of the coins have been deliberately cut into halves and quarters and some seem to have been pierced. They may have been pierced by a nail pinning them to a wooden post or screen in the area of a shrine as a dedicatory act, and similarly the cutting of the coins could represent the use of coins as offerings. The deliberate destruction or defacing of coins might also represent the well-attested phenomenon in prehistoric and Roman Britain of ‘killing’ objects before offering them to the gods. This act makes them unfit for human use and thereby reserved for the gods only. Our article of the waterlogged pit on this website also discusses the phenomenon of the ritual ‘killing’ of certain votive objects on Roman sites.  The coins are being catalogued in detail by Ian Leins, a coin specialist at the British Museum, but this is very much a long-term project, so in the meantime we would like the volunteers to get involved in making our collection more accessible for all and to discover more about the nature of the coin collection in the process. Guy Bud is thinking of doing a small dissertation project on the 3rd c. radiate coins in the collection, and is particularly interested in looking for die-linked coins where groups of coins can be traced to a very specific production site and time.

GuyWe persuaded Guy to do two talks about the Marcham Roman coins to all our volunteer groups in November and March. Guy revealed so many interesting things about the Roman coins, that a number of the Trendles team were inspired to get more involved with post-excavation work on the coins. One of our volunteers, Trevor Greer (a coin enthusiast and a keen photographer!), has offered to photograph the coin collection so we can have an extensive photo library of the assemblage that other people can access. In the future we will look into whether we can put this on-line as a resource for both our volunteers and for anyone interested in Roman coins. Though our Roman coins are mostly in a good condition and don’t require CoinCleaningspecialist conservation and cleaning, there are still a number of coins that are obscured by attached mud. So under Guy’s tutelage, our Wednesday volunteers have started to clean the more robust coins very gently with soap and water. This will enhance them both for analysis and for our planned coin photographic project. We have been told that the conservators working on the famous Staffordshire hoard of Anglo-Saxon metalwork used natural thorns from hawthorn and other shrubs as the ideal tool for cleaning delicate metalwork. These thorns are both robust, but also very fine and flexible enough not to scratch or damage any delicate metalwork. Having discovered it is not easy to find a shop that sells thorns, one of our ever-resourceful volunteers, Steve Nicholson,  turned up one morning with a jam-jar full of carefully cut thorns ( taken from his garden) and all ready to use on our coins! Cleaning work using these prickly tools has already started and so far we can attest to them doing the job extremely well!



All Change!

Lisa's talkIt’s hard to believe that the Trendles Project is one-year old!

After several months, the teams working on stratigraphy, pottery and animal bone are swapping tasks and learning new skills.  The stratigraphy group are the first to go through the changeover.   Lisa Brown, our Iron Age pottery specialist spent the morning with the group, and we were all fascinated to hear Lisa explain how the clay was sourced (and sometimes curated) and how the pots were made and decorated.  She also showed us the different fabric types and how inclusions such as shell and flint were added to the clay to spread the heat more evenly when the pot was fired.

Over the next few weeks the group will learn about Roman pottery and animal bone in archaeology, before choosing  what they want to work on the next.

Visit to the Silchester Excavations – Roman Town Life Project

Ditch in Insula IX

Ditch in Insula IX

The group took a day off from records, pottery and animal bones to visit Reading University’s excavations at Insula IX and the new trench in Insula III, and were given a detailed tour by Amanda Clarke the Director. The excavation had now reached down to the earliest levels on the site representing the Late Iron Age. The group were able to see the 3rd century Roman road level over a metre above the Iron Age layer with intervening stratigraphic levels. The Iron age streets were interestingly laid out in a north west/south east orientation whereas the later Roman streets were laid out in and north south and east west orientation suggesting who was now in charge at Silchester. This years’ excavation had revealed an Iron Age ditch with an ankle breaker slot rather like a Roman military ditch, but it had been dated by iron Age coins found in the ditch fill. Roman military finds had however been found at Silchester. A large rectangular hall outlined by slots and post holes had also been discovered, possibly the largest Iron Age building so far found in Britain and suggesting an important person lived at Silchester.  Around it a number of round houses were being excavated.

Wall in Insula III

Wall in Insula III

The new Insula III had been opened to locate the alleged Roman Baths possibly part of an important building as some monumental stone work had been located in Insula IX which may be associated with it.  Unfortunately the Victorians had appeared to have just dug a large hole destroying valuable stratigraphy and had not dated the buildings. This emphasised the value of modern methods of excavation, recording of the stratigraphy and finds in order to date and interpret the archaeology in post-excavation. Some walls were however appearing and some late Roman archaeology near the surface which had been missed by the earlier excavators had been found so all was not lost.

The tour was concluded with a visit to the ‘finds area’ where the recently washed material was laid out. A number of cases containing the various pottery types found at Silchester showed great similarity to the types currently being processed by the Marcham group. The finds manager showed the group some of the special finds of Roman metal work including a copper alloy toilet set, a brooch and an unusual jug handle shaped like a leg and foot. There was also some unique glass imported into the late Iron Age settlement in the Ist century AD. The richness of the objects hinted at a wealthy community possibly the base for King Verica or another important Iron Age leader, in touch and trading with the Roman world before the conquest.

John Hawes, 8 August 2013

Historic Village Walk – 30 July 2013

DSCN0024Eric Dunford, our Trendles Project Treasurer and volunteer, took the Tuesday volunteers on a fascinating historic tour around the centre of Marcham.  Despite the unfavourable weather (the only day it really rained that week!) we all set off with raincoats and umbrellas and learnt a lot about the story of medieval and post-medieval Marcham. Highlights of the tour included the story of the eccentric Institute building in North Street (complete with flanking lions and gothic windows).  Eric told us how the building was endowed by the Anson family in the 19th century and was fitted with all sorts of amenities including baths for the Marcham ‘unwashed’ poor,  but as there was no maintenance endowment (and the unwashed didn’t fancy using  the baths!) the building gradually fell into disrepair and is still in limbo now.

We took shelter from the rain in the beautiful church at Marcham and learnt how the medieval structure was substantially rebuilt in 1837. Manfred gave us a hilarious account of the infamous Victorian vicar of the church, one Davy Jones, fellow of Christchurch. We heard how his misdemeanours included drinking, womanising, fighting, refusing to bury certain unfortunate corpses, and possibly even murdering someone! We also had a tour round the grounds of Denman College (currently owned by the Women’s Institute) which was originally built as a home for the local Duffield family. After the tour finished we all felt enlightened, entertained and rather soggy round the edges!

Pottery and Biscuits –

– looking for the delicious sounding ‘raspberry roundels’ in our Marcham pottery assemblage.

A visit to Marcham by Jane Timby, our Roman Pottery consultant, 23rd May 2013

Jane Timby talkJane spent the day with us in the pottery sorting work-room at Manor Farm and supervised a refresher pottery identification workshop. After a really interesting talk about the arrival of both the technology (and possibly some actual potters) and the products of proper wheel-thrown vessels into early Roman Britain, she showed us some samples of various regional British Roman fabric types. We showed her the range of Roman pottery fabric types our volunteer group has added to our Marcham pottery fabric reference collection over the last few months, and she was able to identify the kiln groups for them.

 The volunteers were particularly interested in her views on some usual 1st c. A.D pottery fabrics we had identified from the top layers of an unusual barrel-shaped enclosure, located just to the south of the temple and temenos complex. These turned out to include a few sherds of some rare high-status glazed Gaulish imported vessels (dated 40-60 A.D.) and a collection of fine decorated greywares showing a range of unusual barbotine applied dots and lines and swirls, early stamps and very elaborate incised designs, that Jane suspects may have derived from a local early pottery workshop that seems to pre-date the huge Oxford-centred Roman pottery industry that developed later in the region.

'Rasberry Roundel' decoration, compared to the much tastier version preferred by our volunteers

‘Rasberry Roundel’ decoration, compared to the much tastier version preferred by our volunteers

It was a very enjoyable and productive day and the only disappointment for our team was Jane having to correct us on one of our more excitable identification sessions, where we had thought we had found a design called “raspberry roundels” found on early 1st c. Lyons vessels. Ours was very similar, but a copy-cat British version with the less delicious-sounding name of “applied barbotine dot panels”! You can’t win them all and the pottery group will continue to strive to identify as many fabric types that sound like a luxury M& S biscuit as we can!

Sheila Raven

Clay Above Their Heads

IMG_0920-2Peter Warry brought samples of Roman tegulae or roof tile and research documents to present his findings to the volunteers participating in pottery identification and analysis of animal bone from the Marcham excavations.

Peter encountered a problem over 10 years ago finding data on the vast quantities of roof tile dug out of trenches and dumped on spoil heaps, seemingly without further thought to its own story and how it might contribute to the interpretation of the life and time of the site under excavation.  So not to be deterred, Peter spent a few years on spoil heaps and working with the Directorate at Marcham, Silchester and York sites, to name but a few, to identify and classify tegulae in the context of the excavation stratigraphy.

Unlike pottery where inclusions in the clay, production methods for specific usage and possible trade routes are interesting evidence, the clay used for tile making was unadulterated local material and as such is of interest but not likely to contribute to the typology.

So where to next?  Peter amassed a great deal of tile sherds and noticed that during the production stage there are notches cut into the top and bottom of the clay so each tile would rest securely on the tile above and below on a typical 30 degree roof angle.  On a closer look, Peter identified four cutting styles; some cut by hand and others seemed to be moulded.

IMG_0922Did the Romans bring the production skills with them in the second century and did the production methods change over time?  Peter researched Roman military establishments and villas on the Continent which suggested the tegulae production style travelled with the invaders and also noted that tiles made for civic buildings were of a higher specification than tiles produced for villas and other general buildings.

Which of the notch style came first and last?  The huge trench at Roman Silchester in Hampshire, was the perfect excavation site to measure the recovery of tile sherds to examine layer by layer over the seasons between 1997 and 2004 so gave Peter the date range of style A, as he called it, up to AD 120, style B between AD 100-180, style C, AD 140-260 and style D onwards from AD 240.

Peter then observed that the earlier tiles had straight parallel flanges and concluded that they would have been made by pushing the clay into a mould and smoothing the top with a ‘cheese’ wire and then cutting the notches by hand.  A change in production occurred in the third century AD with the introduction of a negative mould so the top of the tile is at the bottom of the mould and by building in a notch shape into the mould it was quicker to produce.

Roman tegula with maker mark and paw print

Tegula with makers mark and paw print

From kiln evidence on military sites Peter deduced that they would have produced their own tiles.  Tiles for civilian use were often made on farms and may have been franchised from evidence of makers initials stamped into the clay.  Tile production would have been an all year round activity and Peter worked out that it would have taken 14 people to quarry, move the clay and form the tegulae. During the dryer months between May and September it took 14 days to load the kiln, fire and unpack the tiles.  Timber to fire the kiln would be gathered during the winter months.

To have your roof tiled was a status symbol and the makers made finger patterns on the corner of each tile before firing.  However on someone’s roof there was an addition of dog paw prints.

On the Marcham site, Peter suggests there is no evidence of buildings with roof tiles but a 3rd-4th century scatter could have been a ritual deposit with coins and pottery, particularly in Trench 2, the cruciform building.  However the Temple had good evidence for a tiled roof which survived after the building fell into disuse.

If you would like to find out more about Roman tile, Peter’s research is published as – Tegulae: Manufacture, typology and use in Roman Britain.  2006 BAR British Series  417.  Archaeopress, Oxford.

Jacqui Newton